Pearson Report American Journal for Nurse Practitioners Nurse Practitioner World News Nurse Practitioner Practice Management Women’s Health Care Journal
Tom Bartol

By Tom Bartol

Tom Bartol is a Family Nurse Practitioner working in Richmond, Maine. He has a large diabetes practice in the family practice setting. Tom is a Certified Diabetes Educator and has a Masters degree in Nursing from the University of Washington in Seattle.

 Academic affiliations include Adjunct Instructor at the University of Southern Maine in Portland, and Adjunct faculty at Husson College in Bangor, Maine.

Tom is active in the Maine Nurse Practitioner Association and the American Diabetes Association. He is on the board of the American College of Nurse Practitioners. He speaks regionally and nationally on various topics including diabetes.

Promoting the NP Profession

It’s Time to Collaborate!

January 2011
I recently heard two different forums on NPR (National Public Radio), “Talk of the Nation” and “Philli Radio Times,” in which an NP and a physician were interviewed about the Institute of Medicine’s publication entitled The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.1 This consensus report, published in October 2010, concluded that:

Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training.

Nurses should achieve higher levels of education and training through an improved education system that promotes seamless academic progression.

Nurses should be full partners, with physicians and other healthcare professionals, in redesigning health care in the United States. 


The NPR commentators in both forums had expected conflict or at least disagreement between the NP and the physician. Both commentators expressed surprise at the amount of harmony between the two practitioners, which I also noticed. For years, NPs have been struggling to create a favorable practice environment in the face of opposition from the medical establishment. Now the tide seems to be turning toward working together. Just imagine what we could accomplish if all of us healthcare practitioners (HCPs) worked together toward a common goal instead of constantly being at odds with each other. We could channel all our energy toward achieving optimal health care for all Americans instead of wasting this energy on turf battles and petty disputes.

The word collaborate is being used more often lately. This word is derived from Latin words meaning work together. Collaborating makes sense. Jeff Susman, MD, editor-in-chief of The Journal of Family Practice, wrote a bold editorial in the December 2010 issue entitled “It’s time to collaborate—not compete—with NPs.” He wrote, “It is time—time to abandon our damagingly divisive, politically Pyrrhic, and ultimately unsustainable struggle with advanced practice nurses (APNs). I urge my fellow family physicians to accept—actually, to embrace—a full partnership with APNs.”2 (Pyrrhic: a victory with devastating cost to the victor; it carries the implication that another such victory will ultimately cause defeat.3)

This type of collaboration with NPs—a two-way collaboration—is a relatively new concept. I recall working in a state in which NPs had a dependent practice. Back then, collaboration was really just a euphemism for supervision by physicians. We needed to have a collaborative practice agreement that was, in essence, a plan entailing physician supervision. The plan outlined who would be the supervising physician and how that supervision would manifest (eg, through chart review). These agreements did not represent collaboration in the true sense of the word. Dr Susman captured the essence of what collaboration really means: to embrace a full partnership, not a competitive role, refocusing our energies together rather than in opposition.

This new entente between MDs and NPs is both an opportunity and a challenge for us. It does not mean that all of us must go out and start our own independent NP practices. But being free of supervision allows us to work within the full scope of our practice—without restrictions. In the real world, this is happening more and more often. In many states in which physician supervision is still required, the letter of the law is not truly being followed; instead, a supervising physician simply places his or her signature on a chart. (Remember, co-signing just means that a chart is co-signed; it doesn’t mean that the co-signer has read the chart!)

Working collaboratively means working together, not only with physicians but also with our NP colleagues and with other HCPs, to provide the most efficient and effective care for our patients. Collaboration doesn’t happen only when physicians and other HCPs fully embrace us. It’s a two-way relationship wherein we need to fully embrace them as well. But please note: Collaboration, in and of itself, doesn’t automatically improve healthcare delivery and health care. Here are some ways that we can make collaboration work to improve healthcare delivery and outcomes in this country:

Track outcomes data. I often feel as though I’m making a difference in a patient’s health care, in his or her life, but are there data to prove that? We NPs are great at providing care, but we need to continue to show that our care leads to favorable outcomes. In this age of electronic health records, data are easy to track. Consider performing simple tracking measures with regard to patients’ weight loss or HbA1c changes, or join a group in your state or area that is tracking outcomes. Data will make a difference in securing funding for projects and services. When we can show that our patient’s weight loss saves money in the long run, more payers will support our expanded efforts to help patients lose weight. 

Support safe and proven expansions of the scope of practice of other healthcare professionals. Let’s not do to others what has been done to us. Let’s collaborate from the get-go, look at the information, and see whether the outcome is better patient care. We must not follow the example of the opposition. Let’s not criticize others and not fight safe practices of other HCPs. Let’s set a new precedent of cooperation and collaboration. 

Remember that we are part of a bigger healthcare system. We must do our best in each individual case, but we should also know that other resources are available to us. Relying on others ranges from asking a colleague to check which test to order to referring a patient to someone with more experience or expertise in a specific area. 

Don’t label ourselves as something less than physicians or as mid-levels. We are not inferior or submissive to anyone. We are members of a healthcare team, working together to provide high-quality care for our patients. We must never sell ourselves short in this process. I meet too many NPs who want to be supervised. Our attitude needs to be one of collegiality, not submissiveness.


Dr Susman concluded his editorial by writing, “I’m convinced that joining forces with APNs to develop innovative models of team care will lead to the best health outcomes. In a world of accountable health care organizations, health innovation zones, and medical ‘neighborhoods,’ we gain far more from collaboration than from competition.”2 This collaboration means that we NPs need to join forces with HCP colleagues and that we NPs also have more to gain from collaboration. If we have had any hesitancy to join together, let’s allow Dr Susman’s bold words to inspire us to collaborate with our colleagues for the benefit of all the patients we serve.

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. October 5, 2010. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx
  2. Susman J. It’s time to collaborate—not compete—with NPs. J Fam Pract. 2010;59(12):672.  http://www.jfponline.com/Pages.asp?AID=9173&issue=December_2010&UID=) 
  3. Wikipedia. Pyrrhic victory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhic_victory

Tom Bartol can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)